Talk:New York 3D printer blocking technology mandate: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: Yesterday at 07:41 by NonPassivatedMOSFET in topic Background analysis essay
No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
→Background analysis essay: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Background analysis essay == | ==Background analysis essay== | ||
Background analysis on the technical, factual, and legal basis of 3D-printer blocking mandates: [[User:Louis/3D-printed firearms and the technical basis for printer mandates]]. [[User:Louis|Louis]] ([[User talk:Louis|talk]]) 03:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | Background analysis on the technical, factual, and legal basis of 3D-printer blocking mandates: [[User:Louis/3D-printed firearms and the technical basis for printer mandates]]. [[User:Louis|Louis]] ([[User talk:Louis|talk]]) 03:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Maybe important to highlight: P.A. Luty's book exists, so I'd say the ship kind of sailed if they want to control the concept of homemade automated firearms. Any idiot with access to basic hand tools and some metal stock can make an automatic firearm that's semi-reliable that will quite easily outperform almost anything 3D printed. [[User:NonPassivatedMOSFET|NonPassivatedMOSFET]] ([[User talk:NonPassivatedMOSFET|talk]]) 07:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:41, 2 June 2026
Background analysis essay
Background analysis on the technical, factual, and legal basis of 3D-printer blocking mandates: User:Louis/3D-printed firearms and the technical basis for printer mandates. Louis (talk) 03:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe important to highlight: P.A. Luty's book exists, so I'd say the ship kind of sailed if they want to control the concept of homemade automated firearms. Any idiot with access to basic hand tools and some metal stock can make an automatic firearm that's semi-reliable that will quite easily outperform almost anything 3D printed. NonPassivatedMOSFET (talk) 07:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)