Nintendo: Difference between revisions

OlsroFR (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
OlsroFR (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 94: Line 94:


This nuclear answer and excess of corporate control harms the consumer and this is also an ecological disaster to remotely brick consoles just because a company believes (on its own discretion) that unauthorized copies of games were used in an offline context. <ref>{{Cite journal |title=Nintendo will take your Switch 2 offline forever if you use a Mig flash cartridge |url=https://www.theverge.com/news/688483/nintendo-switch-2-ban-error-code-mig-flash-cartridge-online |journal=The Verge}}</ref>
This nuclear answer and excess of corporate control harms the consumer and this is also an ecological disaster to remotely brick consoles just because a company believes (on its own discretion) that unauthorized copies of games were used in an offline context. <ref>{{Cite journal |title=Nintendo will take your Switch 2 offline forever if you use a Mig flash cartridge |url=https://www.theverge.com/news/688483/nintendo-switch-2-ban-error-code-mig-flash-cartridge-online |journal=The Verge}}</ref>
Running Switch 1 physical copies of games on a banned Switch 2 (like Zelda Breath of the Wild) does not work because the console require to download retro-compatibility data from Nintendo servers at first launch so the game can boot. <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-06-20 |title=Nintendo BRICKS MIG Flash user's Switch 2 - The Difference between banning a Switch and BRICKING it |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn4969P2RIA |website=YouTube}}</ref>


==Products<!-- Please keep this section reserved for products which are expected to be relevant to the wiki, and at least try to organize products chronologically. -->==
==Products<!-- Please keep this section reserved for products which are expected to be relevant to the wiki, and at least try to organize products chronologically. -->==