Talk:Oneplus phone update introduces hardware anti-rollback: Difference between revisions

:the way I see it. one does not implement ARB by mistake. it was a conscientious decision to do it like this but due to the backlash they could've changed their stance on the matter. we might not know till it gets confirmed. now regarding CN vs other variants, the person that broke the news, AdaUnlocked themselves advise [https://xdaforums.com/t/critical-warning-coloros-16-0-3-501-updates-permanent-anti-rollback-arb-fuse-blown-do-not-downgrade.4775930/#post-90452179 caution]. in the same thread they also [https://xdaforums.com/t/critical-warning-coloros-16-0-3-501-updates-permanent-anti-rollback-arb-fuse-blown-do-not-downgrade.4775930/post-90454883 addressed] being called misleading/spreading missinfo but albeit regarding the existence of the efuses. we apply the American method to this one for now "guilty till proven otherwise". [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 09:16, 24 January 2026 (UTC)