Talk:Predatory microtransactions
Broken Filters
editThere's an issue with the spam filter at the moment which means that, due to the presence of a restricted word, no-one without advanced persms is able to edit the page.
We're working on a fix, but for now please save any proposed edits for this page in a text editor, and feel free to discuss them here while we work on a fix Keith (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Overbroad page
editI think this page steps a bit over the anti-consumer threshold. More precise and descriptive subsection titles ('Bias' is particularly weird) would be useful as well as a more narrow focus which avoids overlapping too much with dark patterns, etc.
I might also suggest changing the page title to 'predatory microtransactions' as this would help to avoid the implication that all microtransactions are automatically anti-consumer. Keith (talk) 18:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- I do have to admit, I was struggling to get some proper ideas for the proper section names to write up, so I am more than welcome to see a better name implemented for this purpose.
- As for the title change, you have my support on it, just make sure you get the redirects set up! (I was considering having 'mtx' be a redirect as well) JamesTDG (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think this page can be combined with the regular Microtransactions article. The overview of that article already sets the disclaimer that it's not inherently anti-consumer. So putting the info of this article there could help refine that one to focus on consumer rights. Beanie Bo (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that this article's former name was 'Microtransactions'. Also, Microtransaction is far too criminally underdeveloped to consider merging this into that article. JamesTDG (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- It was really confusing to have this article, but not have on on microtransactions. (Including redlinks in other articles.)
- I recreated microtransactions as a redirect to here (plus a note there saying to look here before making it not a redirect).
- I think this article would make more sense as microtransactions, noting the problematic cases in the contents. (I don't think every concept has to be anti-consumer, there is even a pro-consumer concepts section.) However, I see that others see things differently. As long as it is in one article that can be found from the microtransactions redirect, I don't much care what it is called. Drakeula (talk) 08:11, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that this article's former name was 'Microtransactions'. Also, Microtransaction is far too criminally underdeveloped to consider merging this into that article. JamesTDG (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I think this page can be combined with the regular Microtransactions article. The overview of that article already sets the disclaimer that it's not inherently anti-consumer. So putting the info of this article there could help refine that one to focus on consumer rights. Beanie Bo (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Source dump
edit
https://ethicsandvideogames.com/?p=858
https://shoppress-prod.azurewebsites.net/ota-microtransactions/